Does California Civil Code hold up in court?

I recently had to sue my landlord for multiple violations to California civil code section 1950.5. One of them was the requirement for the landlord to notify the tenant in writing of their right to a pre-move inspection. They didn't do this, however, the judge didn't seem to concerned about it. We will get our verdict by mail in 30 days. I am curious how the courts are supposed to uphold the law. This seems pretty straightforward, they didn't provide it in writing, I don't see much "wiggle" room there. Thanks.